On July 16, 2026, Chinese AI lab Moonshot AI (backed by Alibaba) announced Kimi K3 — a 2.8-trillion-parameter model the company calls the world's largest open-weight model. The full weights were publicly released on Hugging Face on July 27, 2026, under Moonshot's own "Kimi K3 License". The headline: independent evaluations place K3 just behind today's two strongest closed models, Claude Fable 5 and GPT-5.6 Sol — at a fraction of their API prices.
Quick summary
- When: announced July 16, 2026; weights released July 27, 2026 at huggingface.co/moonshotai/Kimi-K3 under the "Kimi K3 License".
- Who: Moonshot AI — Chinese AI lab backed by Alibaba.
- Model: 2.8T-parameter MoE (16 of 896 experts active), native vision, 1M-token context, always-on reasoning (default effort "max").
- Benchmarks: 1,668 on GDPval-AA v2 — third overall, behind Claude Fable 5 Max and GPT-5.6 Sol Max, ahead of Claude Opus 4.8 Max (1,600).
- Pricing: $3 per 1M input tokens, $15 per 1M output tokens — roughly a third of Fable 5, with the full 1M-token window at the same rate.
What is Kimi K3?
Per Kimi's official blog, K3 is Moonshot's most capable model to date: 2.8 trillion parameters, built on two architectural updates — Kimi Delta Attention (KDA) and Attention Residuals (AttnRes) — with native vision (not a bolted-on module) and a 1-million-token context window. Moonshot calls it "the world's first open 3T-class model," aimed at long-horizon coding, knowledge work and deep reasoning.
Architecturally, K3 pushes Mixture-of-Experts sparsity further: each query activates just 16 of 896 experts. Combined with refined training recipes, Moonshot says K3 converts compute into intelligence about 2.5× more efficiently than Kimi K2. The model reasons by default — at announcement (July 16, 2026) the API exposed a single reasoning_effort level, max, with Moonshot saying lighter modes would follow.
| Item | Kimi K3 |
|---|---|
| Total parameters | 2.8 trillion — largest open model per Moonshot |
| Architecture | MoE activating 16/896 experts + Kimi Delta Attention + Attention Residuals |
| Context window | 1 million tokens (1,048,576) |
| Vision | Native, built into the model |
| Reasoning | Always on; currently "max" effort only |
| Scaling efficiency | ~2.5× vs. Kimi K2 (per Moonshot) |
| Open weights | Released July 27, 2026 (Hugging Face) |
| License | Kimi K3 License (Moonshot's own license) |
| Other open models | DeepSeek V4-Pro 1.6T · Xiaomi 1.02T · Z.AI 744B parameters |
Benchmarks: third in the world, ahead of Opus 4.8
The numbers drawing attention come from independent evaluations. Per Artificial Analysis figures cited by Moonshot in the K3 blog: on GDPval-AA v2 — a leaderboard testing models on real work tasks across 44 occupations in 9 industries — K3 scored 1,668, behind only Claude Fable 5 Max (1,760) and GPT-5.6 Sol Max (1,748), and ahead of Claude Opus 4.8 Max (1,600). On AA-Briefcase (Artificial Analysis' private benchmark for long-horizon agentic knowledge work), K3 scored 1,548 — second behind Fable 5 Max (1,583), ahead of GPT-5.6 Sol Max (1,495).
On front-end coding, Arena.ai's Code Arena leaderboard ranks K3 above Fable 5 — a 17-place jump over its predecessor Kimi K2.6. Arena CEO Anastasios Angelopoulos commented on X that it may be "the single biggest release of the year." For long information-seeking tasks, Moonshot self-reports a 91.2 BrowseComp score running as a single agent — a result that uses a context-compaction strategy triggered at 300K tokens (as applied in the Claude model cards); evaluated with the full 1M-token window and no context management, the score is 90.4. Both are company-reported figures awaiting independent verification.
| Benchmark | Kimi K3 | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| GDPval-AA v2 (real tasks, 44 occupations / 9 industries) | 1,668 — 3rd | Behind Fable 5 Max (1,760) & GPT-5.6 Sol Max (1,748); ahead of Opus 4.8 Max (1,600) |
| AA-Briefcase (long-horizon agentic) | 1,548 — 2nd | Behind Fable 5 Max (1,583); ahead of GPT-5.6 Sol Max (1,495) |
| Code Arena front-end (Arena.ai) | Above Fable 5 | +17 places vs. Kimi K2.6 |
| BrowseComp (single agent) | 91.2 with context compaction · 90.4 without (Moonshot self-reported) | No independent verification yet |
Moonshot itself concedes in its blog that K3's overall performance still trails the two strongest proprietary models, Claude Fable 5 and GPT-5.6 Sol — while delivering frontier-level results and outperforming the other models it tested. The context matters: Fable 5 shipped only last month, and GPT-5.6 debuted a week before K3 — the open-vs-closed gap is now measured in weeks, not quarters.
Pricing: a third of the cost, full 1M-token window at flat rates
Kimi K3 is priced at $3 per 1 million input tokens ($0.30 on cache hits) and $15 per 1 million output tokens (reasoning tokens included) — and those rates apply across the entire 1,048,576-token window, with no long-context surcharge. For comparison, here are the official Anthropic and OpenAI price lists (standard rates, excluding batch discounts):
| Model | Input | Input (cache hit) | Output |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kimi K3 (open) | $3 | $0.30 | $15 |
| Claude Fable 5 (closed) | $10 | $1 | $50 |
| Claude Opus 4.8 (closed) | $5 | $0.50 | $25 |
| GPT-5.6 Sol (closed) | $5 | $0.50 | $30 |
Quick math: K3's input price is 30% of Fable 5's and 60% of Opus 4.8 / GPT-5.6 Sol's; its output price is 30% of Fable 5's and 50% of GPT-5.6 Sol's. For reasoning-heavy workloads with long outputs, the cost gap compounds fast.
What can K3 do? Vision-in-the-loop and long-horizon coding
Moonshot positions K3 for extended engineering sessions: reading large codebases, orchestrating terminal tools, and correcting course on its own when an approach fails. The highlighted differentiator is "vision-in-the-loop" — the model screenshots its rendered output, looks at it, then goes back to fix the code, iterating until it works. Published demos include a browser-based 3D open-world game (Three.js + WebGPU), a simulation of the Long March 10 rocket's launch and return, and a Game Boy Advance emulator. In another case study, K3 ran autonomously for 48 hours to design and verify a chip for a nano model on the Nangate 45nm library using open-source EDA tools.
A second "DeepSeek moment"?
The last time a Chinese lab shipped a cheap model that matched closed U.S. models was DeepSeek R1 in January 2025 — an event that wiped roughly $1 trillion off leading U.S. tech stocks. Former White House AI policy adviser Sriram Krishnan called K3's debut a big moment with industry-wide implications. On the flip side, SiliconANGLE notes Anthropic previously accused Moonshot (along with DeepSeek and MiniMax) of violating its terms by distilling Claude's capabilities to train their own models — expect the debates around distillation and chip export controls to reignite.
As for Moonshot itself: per the Financial Times (via TechCrunch), the company is raising new capital at a $31.5 billion valuation — up sharply from the $2 billion round at a $20 billion valuation it closed in May 2026.
What it means for Vietnamese businesses
Kimi K3 reinforces the trend we analyzed in our DeepSeek V4 and AI sovereignty pieces: open models keep closing in on closed ones, at a fraction of the price. Three practical takeaways:
- Use the API today: for workloads without sensitive data, $3/$15 with a 1M-token context is highly competitive for long-document processing and large codebases.
- Self-host with the released weights: the weights shipped on July 27, 2026, so businesses can run K3 on their own infrastructure — data never leaves the organization. Caveat: 2.8 trillion parameters is a very large model; self-hosting requires a serious GPU cluster, so it suits organizations with existing infrastructure or private cloud. Our recommended framework remains data classification — routine tasks via API, core data on mid-sized open models on-premise — as laid out in our internal AI roadmap.
- Read the license before commercial use: "open-weight" does not automatically mean anything-goes. K3 ships under the "Kimi K3 License" — not the "Modified MIT" license used for K2. It permits use, modification, distribution and fine-tuning, but a Model-as-a-Service business with more than USD 20 million in revenue over 12 months must sign a separate agreement with Moonshot, and commercial products with more than 100 million monthly active users or more than USD 20 million in monthly revenue must prominently display "Kimi K3". Purely internal use (no software or outputs provided to third parties) is exempt from those two conditions.
Frequently asked questions
Can I download and self-host Kimi K3 yet?
Yes. At announcement (July 16, 2026), K3 was only available via Kimi.com, Kimi Work, Kimi Code and the Kimi API. The full weights were publicly released on July 27, 2026 on Hugging Face (moonshotai/Kimi-K3), ungated, under the Kimi K3 License.
Is Kimi K3 stronger than Claude Fable 5 or GPT-5.6 Sol?
Overall, no — Moonshot itself concedes K3 still trails both. But in independent evaluations K3 ranks third on GDPval-AA v2 (1,668, ahead of Opus 4.8 Max), second on AA-Briefcase, and Arena.ai's front-end leaderboard places K3 above Fable 5.
How much does Kimi K3 cost?
Per Moonshot's API documentation: $0.30 per 1M input tokens on cache hits, $3 per 1M otherwise, and $15 per 1M output tokens (reasoning included). Rates are flat across the full 1M-token context window.
What's the difference between "open-weight" and "open-source"?
Open-weight means the model weights are published for download and self-hosting. It does not necessarily include training code, training data, or a fully permissive license — commercial terms depend on the license shipped with the weights. For K3, the weights shipped on July 27, 2026 under the "Kimi K3 License": MIT-style, with extra conditions for large-scale model services and a name-display requirement for very large products.
Should Vietnamese businesses switch to Kimi K3?
It depends on your data and use case. Non-sensitive tasks: the K3 API is worth testing given the low prices and 1M-token context. Core or sensitive data: the weights are now open, so you can evaluate self-hosting (it needs a large GPU cluster), or use mid-sized open models on your own infrastructure. Run evaluations on your real tasks rather than trusting generic benchmarks.
Deploy internal AI with open-source models
Namtech helps businesses select and operate the right open models (Qwen, SEA-LION, Gemma) on internal infrastructure or private cloud — data stays in-house, costs stay under control.
Book a free consultationNote: This article aggregates public sources as of July 17, 2026; weight-release and license status updated on September 24, 2026 from Moonshot's Hugging Face page; benchmark and pricing figures are as published by Moonshot, Anthropic, OpenAI or the cited sources at the time of writing and may change. For reference only — not technical or investment advice.
- Kimi (Moonshot AI) — Kimi K3: Open Frontier Intelligence (official blog)
- Hugging Face — moonshotai/Kimi-K3 (model card, weights released July 27, 2026)
- Hugging Face — Kimi K3 License (LICENSE file)
- GitHub — MoonshotAI/Kimi-K3
- SiliconANGLE — China's Moonshot throws down the gauntlet with Kimi K3
- OfficeChai — Moonshot's Kimi K3 To Be Largest Open Model With 2.8 Trillion Parameters
- TechCrunch — Moonshot's upcoming Kimi 3 is expected to close the gap with Anthropic's Opus 4.8
- Anthropic — Pricing (Claude Platform Docs)
- OpenAI — API Pricing
- Moonshot AI — Kimi K3 Pricing (Kimi API Platform)